Buch
Debating Laws
-Studies on Parliamentary Justification of Legislation-A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana (Hrsg.)
171,19
EUR
Lieferzeit 12-13 Tage
Übersicht
Verlag | : | Springer International Publishing |
Buchreihe | : | Legisprudence Library |
Sprache | : | Englisch |
Erschienen | : | 03. 01. 2024 |
Seiten | : | 316 |
Einband | : | Gebunden |
Höhe | : | 235 mm |
Breite | : | 155 mm |
Gewicht | : | 670 g |
ISBN | : | 9783031467264 |
Sprache | : | Englisch |
Illustrationen | : | XVII, 316 p. 13 illus. |
Autorinformation
A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana, Dr. iur., LL.M. (Genova), is professor at the Law Faculty of the University of Zaragoza. His publications include Legitimidad a través de la comunicación (2011), Derecho y cultura de protección de datos (2012, with J.F. Muñoz), Conceptions and misconceptions of legislation (2019, ed.), La legislación en serio (2019, ed.), Rational lawmaking under review (2016, co-edited with K. Meßerschmidt), The rationality and justification of legislation (2013, co-edited with L. Wintgens) and Derechos fundamentales, principios y argumentación (2011, co-edited with L. Clérico and J. Sieckmann).
Inhaltsverzeichnis
1 Legislative Debates in Parliament as a Source of Statutory Justification. AFramework for Analysis and Evaluation.- 2 Was It Really ‘To No Avail’? The Legislative Deliberation on Underage Girls’ Access to Abortion in Spain.- 3 Legislative Debates on Death with Dignity and Euthanasia. An Approach to the Spanish Situation.- 4 Debating on the Rights of Crime Victims: A Legisprudential Examination of the Parliamentary Deliberation on the Spanish Victim Protection Act.- 5 Expelling, Discussing, and Throwing Values Out – The Parliamentary Debate on the Citizen Security Act and the ‘Push-backs’ at the Moroccan-Spanish Borders.- 6 Parliamentary Debate as a Source of Justification for the Combat against Gender Violence Act.- 7 Parliamentary Debates on Joint Custody Legislation.- 8 Parliamentary Debates on Bullfighting in Spain: Animals Lost in Translation?.- 9 Minimum Vital Income: A Legislative Debate from the ‘Participant-Observer’ Perspective.- 10 InterpretingFundamental Rights from the (Parliamentary) Bench. Notes on Constitutional Argumentation in Legislative Debates.